Many physicians didn't have any policies, guidelines or procedures to aid them when confronted with all the unprofessional behavior of a specific doctor — particularly when such behavior wasn't directly associated with quality of care.
Together with the intent of getting physicians actively and appropriately deal with the dilemma of unprofessional doctor behavior; the Joint Commission now needs licensed healthcare organizations to establish procedures and policies to deal with disruptive physician behavior at work.
While all health care professionals may concur that these policies and processes are beneficial from the hospital setting, the language of the policy embraced by a hospital and a hospital's Medical Executive Committee (MEC) has to be quantified to reduce misuse.
They need to offer both staff and hospitals doctors with a just and reasonable mechanism to appropriately rectify possible behavioral issues. You can browse http://www.thedisruptivephysician.com for alternative disruptive physicians details.
From the pronouncements, it's apparent that the Joint Commission considers that a state policy to deal with disruptive behavior by doctors is necessary; differently, the hospital is implicitly promoting "disruptive behavior".
On the other hand, the Joint Commission has neglected to define or define what might constitute "improper" or "disruptive behaviors".
Without more advice from the Joint Commission, doctors have to be worried about and involved with the construction of, hospital policies and processes directed at addressing these behaviors so as to shield doctors from unnecessary adverse actions from their employees’ privileges.